Showing posts sorted by relevance for query lovecraft. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query lovecraft. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, November 6, 2010

[Review] 'The Case of Charles Dexter Ward' by H.P. Lovecraft [Part 1]

Title: The Case of Dexter Ward
Author: H.P. Lovecraft
Genres: Horror
Softcover: 128 pages
Publisher: originally by Weird Tales in 1941; my translation is from 2007 by Publishing Group Bulgaria
Standalone/Series: Standalone
Copy: Bought it myself

Blurb: Incantations of black magic unearthed unspeakable horrors in a quiet town near Providence, Rhode Island. Evil spirits are being resurrected from beyond the grave, a supernatural force so twisted that it kills without offering the mercy of death!

Available from: Amazon - US - UK | B&N | BookDepository

Cover Comment: The shady, out-of-focus image that you’re seeing is the Bulgarian cover for this novel, which is a miserable cross between drawing and photo manipulation. My edition carries the novel The Case of Charles Dexter Ward as well as the novella Herbert West – Reanimator, which I think is why my book is called ‘The Re-Animator’. I never could find an image with better resolution and my copy is stashed somewhere I can’t find, so you can’t see how bad the cover actually is. Apart from trying to be current in design and failing at it, this is by far one of the better covers Bulgarian designers can produce. However, there is a lot on the cover that makes me cringe. Formatting the company name as the text the hunched man is so focused on writing is plain wrong as well as adding the title ‘The Call of Cthulhu’ in red, right lower corner. I wanted to comment on the cover to explain why SFF genre is not thriving here with original Bulgarian covers. It’s simply not eye-candy at best.

Review: The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is my first foray into Lovecraft and his demented fantasies, which I was more than convinced that I would love. My only regret so far is that my official christening is done through a translation and not in the original language, because I’m a firm believer that the original language holds more power over the reader. Even so, I found The Case of Charles Dexter Ward to be properly horrifying at the right places and interesting as a whole.

The novel is divided in five chapters, of which I will cover the first two and speak about the mechanics of the storytelling, the prose and worldbuilding. The story opens with ‘Conclusion and Prologue’, which introduces us to the setting [Providence in Rhode Island], presents the story [the sudden psychological and pathological degradation of the eccentric amateur-historian Charles Dexter Ward] and then the mystery [his disappearance from the asylum, where he has been treated]. From then on this brief section outlines the life of Charles: his childhood passion for history and genealogy, then his rapid changes from the harmless eccentricity to causing dread as well as his metamorphosis, where his interests shift from history to the modern world.

The interesting thing about Lovecraft is his heavy reliance on prose and omission of dialogue altogether. In his On Writing Stephen King speaks of Lovecraft’s inability to craft dialogue, which would explain the complete absence of it at large and also why when used, it’s done so in a sparing manner. I can’t judge that weakness, but it shows a great skill to labor one story without such a key component. What contributed to the success of this storytelling model is the documentary feel to it. Lovecraft has meticulously noted down a detailed timeline with a great many inserted opinions from different people and sources. The combined effect is one of omniscience based on the accumulated accounts and that this story can be nothing but true.

In the second chapter, ‘Past and Nightmare’ Lovecraft dedicates sixty pages to piece together the past of Joseph Curwen, Ward’s mysteriously discovered relative. Lovecraft charts his arrival to Providence, his accession as a successful trader, his shrouded in mystery hobbies and the communal outrage towards his activities, which results into an expedition of 100 men and his supposed murder.

Even though Curwen is deceased, he’s relevant to the story as it’s his legacy that acts as a catalyst for Ward’s transformation. It’s why Lovecraft goes at great length to flesh him out. Joseph’s story is sewn together from excerpts from letters, journals, registers and old newspapers. I could sense how passionate Lovecraft was while adding these details and this investigative approach to his research.

Where Lovecraft shines with his worldbuilding is with Providence. His narrative is littered with small sidetracks; perhaps two lines or even a phrase to add a small, inconsequential bit or trivia. Whereas modern horror often thrive in isolation; encapsulated in a house, a cottage, a flat or in a day, a week, a month and often exclude the city and society as characters. Here it’s the opposite. The reader is not only whisked away into the past to read of Joseph’s story, but to read of Providence as well.

Last but not least, I’d like to speak of Lovecraft’s horror. It’s widely known that the quote: ‘The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown.’ belongs to Lovecraft and he practiced what he preached. In chapter two, I was chilled at several places without really getting direct answers. Joseph’s farm, the experiments he conducts there and the townsfolk expedition remain shrouded in secrecy with only hints and indirect accounts as to what unholy things transpired.

I found this both intriguing, annoying and dread inducing. The modern reader [horror lover] is accustomed to full frontal, visual attacks, high-definition and uncensored in rendition of gore, blood and deformity. Lovecraft shifts the focus from sight to hearing and smell [rarely relying on sights and when horrors are described the account is secondary] and remains vague at large in his descriptions. The mixture of awareness that something horrid is transpiring and the fact that these events are unrestricted by any dimensions is truly potent.

The reader can fill out the blanks with his/hers own personal phobias, thus amplifying the fear. Because where one fears snakes, another might love them, which can be said about pretty much everything. Scaring a lot of people with a plethora of different terrors is a challenge, especially to the modern jaded horror fan. Lovecraft’s technique is successful, because the fear of the unknown is still a primary fear.

Next Part: In the next part, I will pay more attention to the plot of the novel and later discuss the themes in the story. I warn you that tomorrow’s plot discussion will have only one spoiler but it’s the crux of the mystery, so you better watch out for my sign.

NOTE: Hope you enjoyed this a bit improved method for reviewing novels. I welcome all sort of feedback.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Carl Vincent: Where has all the mystery gone?

Foreword: I have amazing blogger and friend Carl Vincent over from "Stainless Steel Droppings" to take the spotlight for one day and speak about whatever he pleases. This is the result and I hope that you are as thrilled as I am.
____

Where has all the mystery gone?

As October approaches here in these United States, my thoughts, and my short story reading habits, turn to H.P. Lovecraft, Edgar Allan Poe, M.R. James and the like. By today’s horror standards the yarns crafted by these gentlemen might seem trite, old-fashioned, even downright quaint. For some these stories do not deliver the terror of more contemporary horror masters like Clive Barker or Stephen King. These stories, because of the time that has passed since they first captured the imagination of readers, have a sense of nostalgia to them that admittedly does not light a fire in some readers.

For others, however, these stories burn—they burn with the flame of something captured then that seems much more elusive today: the undiscovered country. Bear with me here, I do have a point even if it does seem a might blurry at the moment. I first ‘discovered’ H.P. Lovecraft two years ago. For all of my adult life up until then I had been a fan of Poe, but had always thought Lovecraft’s work to be, primarily because of unsettling book cover art, far off the beaten path of what I liked in regards to the horror genre. I had a “thanks, but no thanks” attitude towards the man’s work. As hackneyed as it may sound, it really only took that first story to plant the seeds of devotion. What was it about the stories of H.P. Lovecraft in particular that cut right to the heart of me? Sure, he was a talented and prolific author, but it wasn’t just that. It didn’t take me long to realize what it was: H.P. Lovecraft, and other story tellers around that same time period, wrote with a perspective that simply cannot be easily duplicated today. There was still mystery in the world.

In today’s technologically advanced, “there is an explanation for everything” world, we often look back at the late 1800’s and early 1900’s with a far more romanticized view of the way the world was. Though the world certainly was not that simple, and while there was certainly a great deal of marvelous advancement, there was still so much potential for an H.P. Lovecraft setting. Ancient cursed Egyptian ruins, damned bloodlines, books of forbidden knowledge, old gods kept at bay by the very thinnest of protective veils, tombs and caves which, once entered, insured that the adventurer would never be heard from again. One has to believe at the time these were written that many a person partaking of one of Lovecraft’s tales experienced the very exquisite kind of terror that comes from reading something that one feels just might have a slight possibility of being true. What child, or grown up with a childlike heart, doesn’t secretly wish there were ancient, possibly haunted ruins one might come across while wandering through the woods, or caves leading downward to the lair of some ancient evil, or dark tomes of untold knowledge to be found hidden in some great ancestor’s attic library? It is the ability of the author to write a story that allows me to travel back to that time in my imagination and see the story from the protagonist’s eyes that endears authors like H.P. Lovecraft to me. They speak to that spirit of adventure and the unknown that seems hard to come by in this age of advancement.

Of course my lamentations are a little melodramatic. Certainly there are a great deal of unexplained mysteries out there, places that have yet to be discovered. One can hope anyway. But does it feel the same way it would have felt back in the early 1900’s reading Lovecraft’s work? I’m not sure it does. Please feel free to put this down as the addled thoughts of a man intoxicated on cool autumn breezes. You would not be far off in that assessment. However, I have been fascinated with this line of thinking ever since I first read H.P. Lovecraft and this wonderful opportunity to guest post on Harry’s site seemed to me the ideal place to begin to more fully form this idea. I would like to hear from you. What are your thoughts? Are there contemporary authors who are capturing that same sense of the unexplored? Has the increase in knowledge taken away our ability to be superstitious, to tremble at the unexplained, to believe in ghosts? Will stories like those of Poe and Lovecraft continue to haunt readers over the next 100 years as they have over the past? And does it matter if they do not?

Thank you so much Harry for the opportunity. I appreciate you trusting me with your blog for the day! It is a real honor.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

[Review] 'The Case of Charles Dexter Ward' by H.P. Lovecraft [Part 2]

Title: The Case of Charles Dexter Ward
Author: H.P. Lovecraft
Genres: Horror
Softcover: 128 pages
Publisher: originally by Weird Tales in 1941; my translation is from 2007 by Publishing Group Bulgaria
Standalone/Series: Standalone
Copy: Bought it myself

Blurb: Incantations of black magic unearthed unspeakable horrors in a quiet town near Providence, Rhode Island. Evil spirits are being resurrected from beyond the grave, a supernatural force so twisted that it kills without offering the mercy of death!

Available from: Amazon - US - UK | B&N | BookDepository

Cover Comment: I’m showing the cover of the most recent re-release of The Case of Dexter Ward [2008], which certainly is superior to its Bulgarian counterpart. Despite the easy to look at color combination, the cover doesn’t fail at its task to announce that the novel is horror and that it promises to be creepy. Also, I believe this cover art to be brilliant, because it is public friendly. If by any chance you read this in the park [in the bus/train] people won’t raise their eyebrows in disgust had this cover been with skulls or dead people. Everyone is happy.

Review: In the first part of my review [HERE] I discussed the first two chapters and touched upon the physical qualities of the text, the narration and the worldbuilding. Now, I’ll focus more on the plot, characterization and then speak about the themes.

Lovecraft considerately stalls the story with build-up and exposition. The first two chapters serve as blueprints for Ward and Curwen as characters. Chapter three continues in the same manner and maps out Ward’s transformations. But this process remains far from clear and reveals nothing to the reader. Supposedly, Ward experiments with far from normal materials and succeeds. At this point my patience stretched to the point I was not sure whether I could continue reading the novel as nothing really was said up straight. What are the purposes of the experiments? What triggered the changes in Ward? Why were bodies missing from the local graveyard? What was that smell in the library?

Thankfully, chapters four and five stopped with the irking foreshadowing and hinting and did their best to get to the heart of the mystery that Charles Dexter Ward had become. Lovecraft still manages to forbid the reader a full-frontal exposure by switching POVs between Charles, the family doctor, Mr. Willett and Charles’ father. In these chapters the Ward family becomes progressively worried about Charles’ health, so they begin an investigation of their own [but I have to say that the mother figure is passive and suffers from nerves throughout the book]. It’s discovered that Charles’ research lab, built in a bungalow as far away as possible from the family home, is inconspicuous, but the true horror is underneath the bungalow in a labyrinth of tunnels and chambers with alters inside.

SPOILER ALERT: Dr. Willett discovers that Charles performs rituals to raise spirits and gain knowledge. This process is coordinated with other necromancers all around the world, which have managed to cheat death once. At this point I stopped complaining about the book being a bit too mysterious for its own good and drooled as revelation after revelation happened on the page. While I’m in the spoiler section, I’ll mention how Lovecraft delivers a mighty twist I didn’t see coming. Turns out that the mysterious Dr. Allen, with whom Charles worked in the bungalow laboratory, was actually a resurrected Curwen. It was Curwen who killed Ward and then assumed his identity. By now this sounds a bit like a session of playing “Clue” with your friends and in retrospect, I should have seen this coming. For starters, Lovecraft underlines how much Charles resembles Curwen and Curwen’s portrait has been given a sort of sentient presence; much like in Dorian Gray. Ward’s contradictory behavior at the time of his death and the library as the place of murder [I mentioned the smell, now didn’t I?] function as small details that add flavor to the story, but de facto act as clues. < END SPOILER|

I won’t discuss the ending, for it is quite satisfying and has to be read. Willett’s confrontation with Ward in the asylum, which leads to the mystery depicted in the first chapter, is brilliant as a resolution. I will however stop to comment on Lovecraft’s rationalization of the fear of the unknown. Lovecraft suggests that we as a species demand for everything to have a logical explanation and that humankind has an image of how the world works. Now what can strike more fear in the hearts of men [once again I do refer to the male gender, because there were no female characters] than coming up against a process or an event, which we cannot fit in the model we have created for the world. It is through knowing this fear that Lovecraft manages to incorporate the supernatural into his tale.

In The Case of Dexter Ward the characters that represent intelligence and knowledge [despite shown as a formless mass] the psychiatrists fear expanding their horizons and are depicted as conservative. They represent how comfortable humans can be with their definition of reality and the world. Keeping in mind that there might be something else they can’t explain or even fathom is ridiculous for them. They fear that unknown, because they are powerless without answers. On the contrary, Dr. Willett faces that fear and overcomes it, because he keeps an open mind and works with what he has despite the impossibility of the situations he finds himself in.

Despite being a horror story about necromancers, mutated creatures and summoning rituals, The Case of Dexter Ward is at its heart a cautionary tale about knowledge. The necromancers’ goal is to achieve dominance through vast and unending knowledge. The narcotic dependency on knowledge, the constant thirst for it and the immoral methods for acquiring it are results of our need to explain things. I think Lovecraft’s message is that some things are better off left unknown as opposed to prodded lest they bite back.

What the Library Says: The library is pleased. The library senses a new re-print soon enough. The library is certain the novel will have an excellent shelf life.

Reviews I’ve seen: [so far none. If you are a book blogger and have a review of this book, tell me and I will link it for you]



Sunday, January 3, 2010

Locke & Key: Welcome to Lovecraft / Head Games

Locke & Key tells of Keyhouse, an unlikely New England mansion, with fantastic doors that transform all who dare to walk through them.... and home to a hate-filled and relentless creature that will not rest until it forces open the most terrible door of them all...! Acclaimed suspense novelist and New York Times best-selling author Joe Hill (Heart-Shaped Box) creates an all-new story of dark fantasy and wonder, with astounding artwork from Gabriel Rodriguez.

The Locke & Key mini-series have generated a spectacular buzz among fellow reviewers and I knew that I had to read it at some point. What better time than right now, while I am high on my horse and galloping through Comic Book Land. Goofy introductions aside, Joe Hill is a talked about name and although I had the barest sample of his work in The Living Dead anthology with J.J. Adams as an editor, Hill exerts a certain gravitational pull over me.

I decided against refreshing my memory prior to picking Welcome to Lovecraft and let the graphic novel surprise me. Surprised I was, because right from the start I was welcomed with a messy homicide, hints of a rape scene and Locke’s bloody retaliation after two juveniles attack them in their summer house. However Grendell Locke is dead and the Locke family moves to Lovecraft, Massachusetts to rebuild their lives. But dealing with grief is not easy, when done in Keyhouse, a house unlike any other and with a secret dweller, posing as Bode Locke’s [the youngest Locke] echo, but a more sinister nature and vicious intentions.

Joe Hill impressed me with Keyhouse as a concept. Old houses fascinate us as objects and sights. We have given them names back in the day and I am positive that this is a practice still kept alive around the globe. These manors and estates have their own history and we liken them to people, usually people of age. It’s quite natural to take this notion further and imagine that one such house has a special talent. Keyhouse is that special place with countless keys of unknown magic properties hidden inside the building and special doors than can change and transport its occupants. It can be both an adventure and a bear trap, stalking in the shadows and biding its time.

No concept is complete without the proper cast to drive the reader to the last page and charm him enough to fall in love with the ideas. As a reader I am more and more convinced that it’s all about the characters and the Locke clan is endearing and each member had something to offer to me emotionally to be hooked on how their personal fate would develop and how they as individuals dealt with their grief and adjusted to Lovecraft.

I have never been satisfied with children and teens as characters prior to Locke & Key, mainly due to the dissonance between what adolescents perceive and understand about their social environment and about what they are innocent and naïve to not grasp at all [with teens my main gripe is with maturity in general]. However the Locke children, especially Bode the youngest, didn’t trip any alarms and that certainly impressed me.

Then there is Sam Lesser. The opening issues portrayed him as a psychotic murderer and yet near the end, when his relations to the Locke family are revealed [also how he became what he is], I couldn’t remain cold hearted to him as a character. Unenviable personal tragedy marks Sam’s life and tragedy seems to be describe the Locke’s general condition, but Hill is sure to stray away from charted waters and adds new touches to this story archetype, which is still popular in pop culture.

Locke & Key sounds too good to be true right about now, so the pessimists are bound to say that the art department probably is below the writer’s skill. To those people I say nonsense, because Gabriel Rodriguez seems to have been commissioned by the comic book gods and has supplied the matching illustrations to enhance the experience from story and concept. My preferences towards the human face and body have been tainted by super hero comic art, where proportions and shape are driven to anatomical perfection and beyond. So I needed a few initial moments to warm up towards how Rodriguez portrayed people, but this is an issue I have as an art lover as far as comic books are considered. His skilled pencil has breathed life to Keyhouse and its scenic authenticity as well as the breathtaking key designs, which I hope that someday are crafted into actual keys.

Verdict: Bravo, I want more.

New York Times bestselling writer Joe Hill and artist Gabriel Rodriguez, the creators behind the acclaimed Locke & Key: Welcome to Lovecraft, return with the next chapter in the ongoing tale, Head Games. Following a shocking death that dredges up memories of their father's murder, Kinsey and Tyler Locke are thrown into choppy emotional waters, and turn to their new friend, Zack Wells, for support, little suspecting Zack's dark secret. Meanwhile, six-year-old Bode Locke tries to puzzle out the secret of the head key, and Uncle Duncan is jarred into the past by a disturbingly familiar face. Open your mind - the head games are just getting started!

According to my plans I should have stopped at Welcome to Lovecraft, but knowing a second volume existed proved too much of a temptation and I ended up picking Head Games almost immediately. This speaks ill for me as a person [weak willed junkie], but speaks tons about the creators and the quality work team Hill/Rodriguez provides.

Compared to Welcome to Lovecraft, the plot has slowed down a few notches in favor of character exploration and development. Sam Lesser is dead [or is he?] and the family is safe from any immediate physical harm. But that doesn’t mean they are out of the woods, because their world has been breached by a new threat masked as a friend: Zack. The young man immediately attaches himself to the Locke family as Tyler’s [the oldest] best friend and then seems to share a romantic moment with Kinsey. I am unwilling to go into details about his agenda and plans, but it’s for certain that bodies litter the ground after he has had his way.

I am not a person to give out spoilers [although I am tempted to], so my discussion of the plot ends here. This volume is tightly connected to the first. Each issue within these volumes have strong ties between each other for one detail mentioned in one issue resurfaces as valuable information in the upcoming ones. Everything is connected into a thick web and a proper discussion would mean spoiling all the fun. To me Hill’s creation is a mosaic, so I will leave you to discover its beauty on your own.

However I can talk all I want about the Head Key. Concept-wise Hill has pleasantly surprised me again and brought to existence an idea that has been bobbing up and down in my head for a while. What if you can open your head and put or take out whatever you please? Hill taps into teen mentality and brings to life a fantasy everybody had once or twice [or countless times] in their youth. I am talking about stuffing the learning material inside the cranium without the tedious hours involved in reading and studying or erasing those unpleasant aspects and memories, which make us think we are weak.

Wonder is paired with scare yet again. Sure, it’s a big thrill to have such a nifty key around, when the situation arises, however in ambitious hands the key can cause harm and pain and lead to broken lives and destroyed feelings. Nevertheless the Head Key has brought in some of the most intriguing scenes such as the interaction between Kinsey’s crying and her fear.

Head Games wouldn’t be the addictive read that it is, if Rodriguez wasn’t the designated artist for this project. As I mentioned above Locke & Key is the love-child of sophisticated story and imaginative and elegant art. I believe the concept, story and characters to be engaging, but they wouldn’t have invaded my imagination with any other artist commissioned to work with Hill. Rodriguez has a rich creative vision, which is responsible for a breathtaking visual of how an open head would look like and what the person’s inner world would resemble. Both creators enhance each other’s talent and even to those that are not comic book readers, I believe, this title will be an irresistible must-have.

Verdict: I am a big fan and I can’t wait to see what will happen in the next installment Crown of Shadows.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Reading Plans for December

In November I set some pretty hardcore reading goals [given the context of NaNoWriMo and the multiple tests from the university]. Let’s recap. I set out to finish The Gunslinger by King, which I did after two sittings. The review should air sometime in 2011. Patience, grasshoppers and bookworms.

I wish I had the same level of success with Poe’s Selected Works. It’s quite surprising to see myself struggle with a book I want to finish. My relationship with this red volume started in 2009, when I bought it and spent eight months trying to start it, until I did start it and now struggle a third month to consistently read through the collection. It’s not that I don’t like the journey and want to put down the book, but for some reason every time I sit down to read it, I fall asleep. Maybe it’s because it’s so heavy and big that I have to place it on the table and then grow sleepy.

My other failure is Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Sea by Jules Verne. I honestly didn’t expect such a relaxed novel [read this as nothing happening] with that such concentration of scientific references [physics and mechanics do not rank that high in my Topics of Interest list and yes, I do have one; this winter it’s all about suicide chickens]. However, I did not finish it because of time restrictions rather than the novel not being my cup of tea.

December will have me attempt to finish both Poe and Verne. I know I will manage Verne, but Poe is a formidable challenge. My other picks include:

I promised Sam Sykes that I will attempt his challenge and read something incredibly outside my comfort zone. Not only outside what I usually enjoy, but actually featuring all the things that I do not like to read. So Azincourt by Bernard Cornwell [the man who wrote the Sharpe’s Stories] combines the three things I essentially find boring: historical fiction, war campaigns and unnecessary length. This also begs the question: Why the heck do I bother with epic fantasy? I plan on answering that.


I return to Lovecraft with The Colour Out of Space, The Shadow over Innsmouth and Rats in the Walls [I checked them all out and all three together can be devoured in one day]. This is research reading [excuse to read more Lovecraft] since I plan on writing a Lovecraftian horror story set in Japan [because Cthulhu is probably their secret mascot] and I want to recreate the correct spirit of what Lovecraft has created.


I will also continue with my research by reading Issue 5 of Innsmouth Free Press to sample some interpretations and convince myself that I’m allowed to bend the world to my own tastes [I do like being faithful to anything]. But while I’m indulging myself in magazines, I will sit down to read M-Brane Issue 21 [I’m making this public, because I plan on reviewing this]. I have been stashing issues since number 14 or so.

I’m completely excited about Monstrous Creatures by Jeff Vandermeer. It’s a non-fiction title and it’s a new review format for me personally. Then again I’ll have finally gotten my greedy little hands on some Vandermeer [which for some reason is impossible for me; if you have Vandermeer and want it to have a new loving home, then my e-mail is on the left of my blog] and there is even some Mieville in there [also a bonus]. I’m prepping this for Rise Reviews, where I will be a monthly addition to their theme [yes, I am everywhere these days].

Last [and most questionable as whether it will be read in December] is The Mysterious Island by Jules Verne. It’s a sequel to Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Sea. I have a January deadline to review the themes of both books using Captain Nemo as a bridging character, so it has to be done. I hope the sequel is an adventure novel with a faster pace than its predecessor or I may have to reconsider Verne altogether no matter how interested I am in going back to the basics of speculative fiction.

Wish me luck. I’ve picked only… *does Math* 10 pieces. Thank god for the holidays.

Tell me now, what have you planned for December?

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

The Weird Revival

People. I am quite sure that you love diversity, oddity and even lunacy. I am sure that you want the whole down-the-rabbit-hole experience and you cheer Lovecraft [he wrote weird too]. I am also certain that you want more weirdness in your life an Paul Jessup wants to bring the weirdness to YOU with The Weird Revival.  

We aim to use this money to promote, publicize, and get the word out about weird books. We're strange people, and we like our stories slippery, bizarre, confounding and surreal. It's hard finding such books that are great to read and to ponder of, and we aim to build a community of weird book lovers.

We plan on getting the word out with bumper stickers, t-shirts, a website with reviews and a weird book club, we plan on talking and promoting publishers who publish the weird and writers who write it. Maybe even throw in a podcast or two, or three, or four or something. Who knows? We want to turn readers into evangelistic surreal preachers of the strange. The weirder the books, the better.

Let the revival commence!

What this money goes towards- 
Buying a web domain and host and prepay it for five years 
Hiring a graphic designer to do logos and other promotional utilities 
Buying advertisements in magazines for the website to promote it and the weird 
Getting the word out, getting the word out

We will also be looking for volunteers once the site gets up and going, to help spread the word and do reviews. In about a year, I'm hoping to not only pay people to help us out, but also start moving towards publishing weird works ourselves.


Will you please help? 

Friday, January 1, 2010

Comic Book Appreciation Month: Official Post

January…the very first… [insert popping champagne and happy party noises]. No, we are not celebrating the New Year. We did that last year. Priorities my friends and the fest continues into the new year and with a new cause to celebrate [You are anxious about this? Right?] and namely it’s time to kick off the very first Comic Book Appreciation Month.

Welcome. Step inside [take your shows off first damn it; this carpet is brand new] and look here and there and everywhere. I bet you are wondering what you can expect from this month and I shall tell you. The schedule is tight and the blog will be spewing content upon content and the focus will fall on reviews as I have mentioned.

But here are the series that I will introduce you to through the upcoming thirty days in order of appearance on the blog.

Locke & Key: Welcome to Lovecraft and Head Games [mini-series, 6 issues each, 2008/2009]
Birds of Prey [concluded series, 127 issues, 1999/2009]
Herogasm [part of The Boys series, 6 issues arc, 2009]
Ultimates [3 volumes, mini-series, published irregularly 2002-2007]
Fables [on-going series, since 2002, have only 50 issues]
I Kill Giants [7 issues, 2008, mini-series]
Madame Mirage [6 issues, mini-series, 2007]
Fathom [3 volumes, 1998-2009]
Young Liars [18 issues, ongoing series, 2008-2009]
Ana Mercury [5 issues, mini-series, 2005]
Ythaq [2 mini-series, 3 issues each, 2003, 2009]
Savage Red Sonja [4 issues, mini-series, 2008]

To add more variety to the mix I have invited several esteemed guests that you have seen blogging like there is no tomorrow. I have Robert from FBC fame and John Ottinger III of Grasping for the Wind fame, but this is just a sample. There are other Secret Guests from the blogging waters that will make an appearance.

I have also reached out into the world of published authors and artists and thus I have amidst the festivities a guest post from C.E. Murphy and an interview with Holly Black and her artist in crime Ted Naifeh. I also have artist Becky Cloonan talk about comics, art and the industry.

If this doesn’t sound like fun, then you a republican [I am just joking, but to be honest, where this pun came from is a mystery to me as well] or worse a Literati [I have crucifixes, damn you].

Friday, February 5, 2010

[News] 2009 Bram Stoker Awards: Preliminary Ballot

I love horror. I support horror, but I need to read more horror. Seriously. And everything from this list seems a tasty morsel... Anyway, congratulations to everybody, who made it. Apparently, you rock. Oh and be sure to win Kaaron Warren.

Superior Achievement in a Novel:

- "Quarantined" by Joe McKinney (Lachesis Publishing)
- "As Fate Would Have It" by Michael Louis Calvillo (Bad Moon Books)
- "Patient Zero" by Jonathan Maberry (St. Martin's Griffin)
- "Cursed" by Jeremy Shipp (Raw Dog Screaming Press)
- "Sacrifice" by John Everson (Leisure)
- "Audrey's Door" by Sarah Langan (Harper)
- "Eternal Vigilance II: Death of Illusions" by Gabrielle Faust (Immanion Press)
- "Twisted Ladder" by Rhodi Hawk (Tor/Forge)
- "Voracious" by Alice Henderson (Jove)
- "The Bone Factory" by Nate Kenyon (Leisure)

Superior Achievement in a First Novel:

- "Damnable" by Hank Schwaeble (Jove)
- "The Black Act" by Louise Bohmer (Library of Horror)
- "Slaughter" by Marcus Griffin (Alexandrian Archives Publishing)
- "Breathers" by S. G. Browne (Broadway Books)
- "The Little Sleep" by Paul Tremblay (Henry Holt)
- "Solomon's Grave" by Daniel G. Keohane (Dragon Moon Press)
- "Dismember" by Daniel Pyle (Wild Child)
- "Slights" by Kaaron Warren (Angry Robot)
- "The Dead Path" by Stephen M. Irwin (Hachette Australia)
- "The Forest of Hands and Teeth" by Carrie Ryan (Delacorte Press/Random House)

Superior Achievement in Long Fiction:

- "Mama Fish" by Rio Youers (Shroud Publishing)
- "Hunger of Empty Vessels" by Scott Edelman (Bad Moon Books)
- "Diana and the Goong-Si" by Lisa Morton (Midnight Walk)
- "Doc Good's Traveling Show" by Gene O’Neill (Bad Moon Books)
- "The Gray Zone" by John R. Little (Bad Moon Books)
- "The Lucid Dreaming" by Lisa Morton (Bad Moon Books)
- "Dreaming Robot Monster" by Mort Castle (Mighty Unclean)
- "Little Graveyard on the Prairie" by Steven E. Wedel (Bad Moon Books)
- "Rot" by Michelle Lee (Skullvines Press)
- "Black Butterflies" by Kurt Newton (Sideshow Press)

Superior Achievement in a Short Fiction:

- "In the Porches of My Ears" by Norman Prentiss (PS Publishing)
- "Blanket of White" by Amy Grech (Blanket of White)
- "Keeping Watch" by Nate Kenyon (Monstrous: 20 Tales of Giant Creature Terror)
- "One More Day" by Brian Freeman (Shivers V)
- "The Crossing of Aldo Ray" by Weston Ochse (The Dead that Walk)
- "Where Sunlight Sleeps" by Brian Freeman (Horror Drive-in)
- "The Night Nurse" by Harry Shannon (Horror Drive-in)
- "Plague Dogs" by Joe McKinney (Potters Field 3)
- "The Outlaws of Hill County" by John Palisano (Harvest Hill)
- "Nub Hut" by Kurt Dinan (Chizine)

Superior Achievement in a Anthology:

- "Midnight Walk" edited by Lisa Morton (Dark House)
- "Poe" edited by Ellen Datlow (Solaris)
- "Harlan County Horrors" edited by Mari Adkins (Apex Publications)
- "He is Legend: An Anthology Celebrating Richard Matheson" edited by Christopher Conlon (Gauntlet Press)
- "Lovecraft Unbound" edited by Ellen Datlow (Dark Horse Books)
- "Dark Delicacies 3: Haunted" edited by Del Howison and Jeff Gelb (Running Press)
- "Butcher Shop Quartet 2" edited by Frank J. Hutton (Cutting Block Press)
- "Grants Pass" edited by Amanda Pillar and Jennifer Brozek (Morrigan Books)
- "Mighty Unclean" edited by Bill Breedlove (Dark Arts Books)
- "British Invasion" by Chris Golden, Tim Lebbon and James Moore (Cemetery Dance Publications)

Superior Achievement in a Collection:

- "A Taste of Tenderloin" by Gene O'Neill (Apex Book Company)
- "Shades of Blood and Shadow" by Angeline Hawkes (Dark Regions Press)
- "Martyrs and Monsters" by Robert Dunbar (DarkHart Press)
- "In the Closet, Under the Bed" by Lee Thomas (Dark Scribe Press)
- "A Little Help from My Friends" by Michael McCarty (Sam's Dot)
- "Got to Kill Them All and Other Stories" by Dennis Etchison (Cemetery Dance)
- "Dark Entities" by David Dunwoody (Dark Regions)
- "Shards" by Shane Jiraiya Cummings (Brimstone Press)
- "Unhappy Endings" by Brian Keene (Delirium Books)
- "You Might Sleep..." by Nick Mamatas (Prime)

Superior Achievement in a Nonfiction:

- "Writers Workshop of Horror" by Michael Knost (Woodland Press)
- "Stephen King: The Non-Fiction" by Rocky Wood and Justin Brook (Cemetery Dance)
- "Cinema Knife Fight" by L. L. Soares and Michael Arruda (Fearzone)
- "Esoteria-Land" by Michael McCarty (BearManor Media)
- "Morbid Curiosity Cures the Blues" edited by Loren Rhoads (Simon & Schuster)
- "The Stephen King Illustrated Companion" by Bev Vincent (Fall River Press)

Superior Achievement in a Poetry Collection:

- "Chimeric Machines" by Lucy A. Snyder (Creative Guy Publishing)
- "Mortician's Tea" by G. O. Clark (Sam's Dot)
- "Double Visions" by Bruce Boston (Dark Regions)
- "Voices from the Dark" by Gary William Crawford (Dark Regions)
- "Barfodder" by Rain Graves (Cemetery Dance)
- "Starkweather Dreams" by Christopher Conlon (Creative Guy Publishing)
- "Toward Absolute Zero" by Karen L. Newman (Sam's Dot)
- "North Left of Earth" by Bruce Boston (Sam's Dot)
- "Grave Bits" by Todd Hanks (Skullvines Press)

Saturday, October 9, 2010

[Reviewer Time] Charles Tan from Bibliophile Stalker


With this Sunday’s edition Reviewer Time will close down permanently. I had a lot of fun for the last two years with the occasional stops and starts and the over 30 interviews I conducted with some of the brightest and most intriguing bloggers, veterans and rookies alike. But I do think all things must come to an end, which is why Charles Tan, creator of The Bibliophile Stalker, will be my last guest at the Reviewer Time feature. I think it was a good run. Reasons to quit include: time deficiency and the feeling that I repeat the same questions over and over again. With above 30 interviews now completed I think that may be the case.

Anyway, enjoy!

---

Harry Makov: Welcome, Charles. I am very pleased to have you here on Reviewer Time. As per the ages old custom, let’s start with basic introductions. Who is Charles Tan and what does he do in off-line life?

Charles Tan: Offline, I'm an editorial assistant and sometimes managing editor for a local publishing company (that sometimes does events such as concerts). As for who I am, I previously defined myself by my hobbies, and I basically went through different fandoms over the years: video games, comics, collectible card games, RPGs, anime/manga, etc.

HM: As an editorial assistant, what do you assist in? From Twitter I have learned that you have helped to edit anthologies. Is that close to the truth?

CT: Actually, no. I work for a magazine company that occasionally does concerts. There are actually several publications that I work on (and one in which I'm the Managing Editor) and my role really varies. Sometimes, it's simply answering the phone and contacting the contributors. Sometimes, it's arranging full-scale photo shoots. Sometimes, it's editing texts, creating the pagination, coordinating with the printer, etc.

The editing the anthologies part is more of my non-day job. The Philippine Speculative Fiction Sampler and Best of Philippine Speculative Fiction was my brainchild for example and funded by me. Recently I helped Lavie Tidhar with the upcoming Apex Book of World SF 2 but that's really about it.

I'm not the next John Joseph Adams for example. :)

HM: Even if you are not involved in assembling anthologies, you seem to pay attention to the latest releases. Therefore I deduct you enjoy reading them a lot. What do you find fascinating about anthologies? Do you pay attention to how the stories are aligned? What importance does the opening and closing stories carry? Basically I am looking for the hidden blueprints and the logic behind anthologies.

CT: For anthologies, it really depends on the anthology. Not all anthologies, for example, is simply about assembling a set of stories. What's the agenda of the editor? What does it try to elicit from the reader? Was the editor successful?

Yes, I pay attention to how the stories are aligned, the importance of the opening and closing stories, etc. The problem with blueprints is that it can't be universally applied. What works for one anthology might not work for another. For example, what impressed me with The New Weird by Jeff VanderMeer is the mix of fiction and non-fiction, the inclusion of stories that are pre-New Weird as well as New Weird itself.

Or The Year's Best Fantasy and Horror series (edited by Ellen Datlow and Terri Windling, later Gavin Grant and Kelly Link). Arguably the best part of it are the lengthy summations of the year, as well as the long honorable mentions list.

Admittedly, some readers simply read the story they want and ignore the rest. That's perfectly possible and legitimate. But as a discerning reader, I know that any anthology isn't arbitrarily assembled. There's a method to the madness, so to speak. That's not to say every editor succeeds in what they attempt to do, but there's also a level where you want to read the text under the editor's own terms (i.e. reading the stories in chronological order).

HM: We all have one of those moments of epiphany, when we realize that we will be tied with fiction for a life time. When did your never-ending affair with books and literature begin?

CT: I was an early reader but honestly didn't become acquainted with genre until my early teens. As a child, I was interested in dinosaurs and mythology, but didn't really end up reading novels. Instead, I grew up reading gaming magazines. Later on, some of these magazines had pop culture references to authors like Tolkien and Lovecraft, and that certainly piqued my interest.

I think the trigger for me being the person you now know me is due to my decision to pursue becoming a writer (as opposed to simply being a reader). It was that shift that enabled me to be more critical of what I read, as well as to open up myself to possibilities, instead of simply reading what I was previously reading. It also helped that the Philippine bookstore scene was changing then as in the 80's and early 90's, readers here had to settle for whatever the bookstore monopoly imported.

HM: When did you start receiving books from outside the Philippines that weren’t imported? I am living in the same conditions. What’s widely available and celebrated in the UK & US, is largely unknown, unless we are talking household names. Like Gaiman.

CT: Depends. I'm friends with some authors, even before I started reviewing regularly, so they did send me some books. When I started doing my interview series, however, that's probably when I started getting books for reviews (due to my reputation by then, not because I was doing interviews per se). For aspiring reviewers, I think it's fair to say that when you start out, you shouldn't be expecting review copies and simply review books that are available to you (even if you have to buy them).

Another of my edges is the fact that I gladly accept PDF copies for review--because I understand the expenses of mailing books, and the delay one experiences (and in some cases, never receive due to the post office, customs, or some other complication).

HM: Speaking of Gaiman, you had the honor of meeting the man, who as Internet tells me [aka your blog] is an icon for you. Do tell how that meeting went.

CT: Gaiman's not really an icon for me. I respect the person, but there are other writers I'm a bigger fan of. Honestly, I'm probably the Philippine's "non-fan" fan of Gaiman.

The meeting was nothing special. It was a book signing so it was pretty procedural. There was one incident though when the couple (literally) behind me proposed via Neil Gaiman...

HM: Which probably means that I need to re-learn how to read properly. To retrace a bit, you mentioned that you strive towards a writing career. I have planned to ask that on my own accord, because it’s interesting to see how many reviewers are writers. I do believe that blogging is a fantastic way to meet new authors in person or through e-mail interviews. What’s your stance on the matter?

CT: It depends. Sometimes, it's in your best interest not to be reviewing books, because they're your peers. Some professional writers have been burned by this, but others have also established their contacts through this. It's all dependent on a lot of factors.

Here's the thing. What's your game plan?

If you want to be a writer, I think it's important to plan to be a writer.

If you want to be a reviewer, plan to be a reviewer.

I don't think it's necessary that in order to be a professional writer, you need to be a reviewer first. Or expect that there's a direct link between the two.

I reviewed books because I wanted to review books, not because I thought it would help my writing career (or lack thereof).

What's great about interviewing authors however is that I get to pick their brain.

HM: What genres do you enjoy writing in and what publications have you had, if any?

CT: I think most of my writing gravitates towards fantasy. As far as fiction is concerned, it's mostly local publications, with my first international sale going to the anthology The Dragon and The Stars edited by Derwin Mak and Eric Choi, published by DAW.

HM: Let’s walk through the history of your blogging career and stop at 2006, when you decided to create your own blog. How did that decision form? What was the idea and intentions behind the Bibliophile Stalker?

CT: I was actually blogging as early as November 2001 but the problem with my blogging was that it was disparate and had no focus. Because I've had other hobbies over the years, the content of my posts fluctuated between disparate subjects.

As a writing discipline, I told myself that I would produce blog content on a regular basis, as opposed to simply being sporadic. And then I latched on to fiction because I was feeling passionate the most about it at the time (my other passion at the time was tabletop RPGs and was active in documenting the podcast scene).

At the end of the day, my blog became a blog that I sought for in other blogs. It had regular reviews, opinion pieces, and interviews with people in the industry that I felt were overlooked or aren't as popular as they're supposed to be. And I didn't want to limit it to authors but others who don't receive enough credit, such as editors, publicists, etc. It was also a continuous challenge for me on how to evolve and deliver additional content that was relevant to my readers.

HM: And yes, this is inevitable. What’s with the creepy name?

CT: I like to freak out people. :) In real life, I tend to be invisible, to the point that automatic doors don't open, or people enter the room and miss me even when I'm in the center of their vision, so I think "stalker" is an apt descriptor.

HM: You are based in the Philippines and can observe the native SFF scene, which I am pretty sure is not very well known to Westerners. What is the difference between Philippine SFF and what is currently sold in the West?

CT: For me, the biggest difference is volume and awareness. We don't end up publishing a lot of fiction (genre or otherwise) for various reasons, and even if you do get published, people aren't generally aware of it.

As for the writing itself, it's a mixed bag. There is some fiction that's obviously Western-inspired, but we also have stories that deal with our own mythology that's quite unique from others. We have a creature called the "tiyanak" for example which is like a carnivorous changeling (baby) that preys on unsuspecting humans.

HM: What are the tropes you encounter in Philippine fiction, which are foreign to Western tradition? What is done differently?

CT: There's the use of our folklore, which is unique. And then there's the inclusion of Americans in stories, which tends to be one of two extremes: either they're saviors or they're villains. Justified, considering our colonial experience.

HM: You are an incredibly busy man, contributing to sites such as the SF Signal, World SF News Blog and Nebula Awards Blog [just to name a few]. How do you manage the whole juggling act?

CT: Eventually, I don't. Some sites I've had to drop over the years, and content that would otherwise appear on my blog has migrated elsewhere. The key however is to actually dedicate time to these sites. You can say you'll dedicate the first 2 hours of your day to these websites and stick to that commitment.

HM: How do you deal with the burn out?

CT: I'm the persevering kind of guy so for me, I just keep at it. I have phases where I'm unproductive (whether it's due to work, an unforeseen medical problem, or simply something else has taken my fancy) but if I keep doing what I do, things eventually turn around. And genre is always exciting!

HM: All these sites are high profile and reputable, so I cannot help but attribute a certain level of divine inaccessibility. How does one become involved with the big players?

CT: Honestly, it's easy to "start" any endeavor, such as producing a blog. What's difficult is maintaining it and keeping it chugging along over the years. Some good book bloggers usually call it quits at the end of a year or two. I certainly wasn't an overnight sensation, and my seemingly-prevalent (I honestly don't think I'm prevalent) status is the result of years of obscurity.

The second factor is to simply volunteer your services. You can't expect other people to always find you. Sometimes, you have to take the first step. SFWA for example is always looking for volunteers. I volunteered (perhaps foolishly :p) for the Nebula Awards Blog. And for SF Signal, it's contacting them and asking them hey, how can I help out you guys?

My mentality, whether it's with my readers or other people, isn't how they can help me, but how can I help them? The rest will follow, but it also takes time.

HM: What about the ‘I am not good enough’ barrier, where the individual think that he/she is not good enough to even be considered, so they do not submit. Have you had such phases? I admit that I have had some initial moments, but I am overcoming them. My biggest issue at the moment is the time deficiency and over-commitment.

CT: I'm practical. I don't have the "I am not good enough barrier". The worst thing an editor/publisher/market can do is reject your story (not you). That's it. Don't make the decision for them. It's up to them to accept or reject your story. It's up to you to send it. If I have problems, it's finding the time and over-commitment to write.

There are obviously times when I think my writing is not good enough, and so revision might take more time than expected. I also do think some writers are better than me. That's reality. But I honestly can't spend the time thinking "I'm not good enough for this market". That's up to them to decide, not me. It's useless thinking that way and all you're doing is closing a potential market. The problem with this line of thinking is that it'll never get better. When have you thought "you know what, I'm now good enough for this market"? The better you get at writing fiction, the more you become aware of your weaknesses and limitations.

HM: Your link-up feature is beyond top notch. I use it as a second go-to after I manage to go through my Google Reader. What’s your system to maintaining such a demanding feature and always be well informed? Do you, by any chance, have an army of informants?

CT: Well, it starts out with simply having an extensive RSS Reader such as Google Reader. Livejournal also doubles as that. And then there are news/content sites which I regularly visit, such as Tor.com, Suvudu.com, and SF Signal.

People also do help out and email me. Paul di Filippo for example regularly sends me news tidbits which he also sends to other genre news sites, such as Locus. There are a lot of industry people (authors, editors, bloggers, etc.) there who have projects/interviews they want to plug so they also email me any relevant piece that they might have (publicists are your best friends). But most of my content comes from casual browsing of my RSS Feeds, Livejournal friends list, and Twitter (and that's the case because I'm deeply interested in genre, as opposed to simply being a casual fan with a few contacts).

Saturday, October 16, 2010

[The Interview Feature] Mechanics of the Interview: The How

As I have revealed earlier in September I switched to a new accomplice to help me complete my Interview Feature. Please welcome Theresa Bazelli, a writer in training [quite the treasure] with her own spot on the web, Ink Stained. She’s not from the book reviewer circles, but she’s curious to hear more about interviews and has decided to help [I did not threaten her life… or I may have just a little bit]. *clears throat*

That inappropriate joke aside, in today’s long overdue third installment of the feature I discuss the how of interviewing [specifically how I do it]. How to keep our guests talking or from the opposite, when needed. How to steer the conversation. How to sprinkle controversy and all that is in-between.

---

Theresa Bazelli: You have interviewed a variety of individuals on your blog: authors, publishing professionals, book bloggers, and even the fictional character or two. How do you decide what kinds of questions that you will ask? Do the questions stem from personal interest, what you think that your readers will appreciate hearing, or do you tailor your questions to what the interviewee is interested in?

Harry Markov: Now that you ask it, I came to realize that interviewing is about pleasing everyone. I interview so that I can satisfy my innate curiosity, but I also think what would intrigue the readers. Plus, I believe that the interview should benefit the author and be relevant to his interests. This is a very summed-up answer to such a myriad of questions. It isn’t an exact science, but objective is to make it interesting and pleasurable for everybody. The trick is to be selfless, when doing one [it seems a bit philosophical] and keep in mind that you are not doing it just for you. The best interviews are the ones that make the interviewee speak loads and keep the reader’s focus and attention. I don’t think I have mastered this [as I came to the conclusion just now]. I have a more simplistic approach and it has to do on why I am interviewing a person. Factors like whether I am asking to learn, asking in order to discuss or asking just because help me guide the interview.

TB: You mentioned that the best interviews are when the interviewee's do most of the speaking. Do you have any tips for how to make your interviewees comfortable, and how to get them talking? Do you start with a few warm-up questions or offline introductions before getting to the meat of the interview?

HM: I seem to be saying a lot of things, now aren’t I? Yes, I do have a model I’m most comfortable with, but I can’t honestly offer it as a tip as I think I am stagnating sticking to the same old as far as interviewing technique goes. But here goes. There are always offline introductions to be had before an interview can be considered. As I said in an earlier part, I need a damn good reason to bother someone for an interview. In 80% of the cases I have read a novel so sharing my review with the author is my ice breaker. Once the actual interview starts I thank my guest for accepting my invitation, because to me it is always humbling for someone to hand over his or her time to me without knowing whether my interview would return the investment. But to be able to make people talk the interviewer has to be able to direct the conversation, ask with details and never let the interview wonder what the questions demand as answers. That is one of the things I learned early, but still working on.

TB: Have you ever had an interview go off track and how do you direct the conversation back onto course? Are there any topics that you consider off-limits, or that you try to steer away from?

HM: In the competitive and highly controversial world of literature and publishing, you have to ask with caution lest you step on a mine… Eh, no. Not so much really. Literature is pretty tame compared politics [lame example, but gets the point across]. There are not many taboos. I do think, however, that talking about Science Fiction’s supposed death to a SF author is probably not so tactful. I also avoid talking about the war between literary and speculative fiction. It’s very old and therefore much has been said on the matter. Those are the two major topics I like to keep away from, though I personally have issues not to trash Twilight. I just happen to slip it in from time to time. As far as ever losing control over an interview… No, this has never happened to me, so I can’t say anything on the matter.

TB: So speaking of controversy, does that mean you're with team Edward or team Jacob? I jest. What if your interviewee is not very talkative, or the questions you have asked are not getting much of a response? How do you change your approach?

HM: I am team Buffy. She kicks ass and is the natural predator of both Edward and Jacob. One can hope that she also deals with the raving and brainwashed fans. One can dream about chainsaw nun-chucks…

Ahem, but I seem to be digressing…

In the first instance, I don’t force someone to spill out paragraph after paragraph just because I want a longer interview. Perhaps the person in question is a man/woman of few words. It’d be a shame to demand more than what that person is comfortable sharing. Then again, I might be saying all this because I keep missing the magic formula that makes anyone and everyone talk and talk. Go figure. It’s all subjective, but coming from my experience such people do exist as do interviewers who have the gift to squeeze out information out of every interviewee.

As far as the second scenario goes… I keep my question and answer in the interview I post, if that is what you’re asking me. I don’t ask people for do-overs because that would be insulting. I try to avoid these downs in conversations by doing my homework beforehand.

TB: Have you ever conducted an interview on a subject that you weren't really interested in, and had hard time coming up with questions? How do you keep finding interesting questions? How do you keep from repeating yourself and keeping things as fresh?

HM: Yes, I admit that among my interviews I agreed to interview an author on request, rather than me contacting him. The result was a lack-luster and short interview that served as additional promo material for him, but to me was very unsatisfying. It was an impulse decision, because I’m rarely contacted by US publicists. I would have done a better one had I read his novel first [it is a good novel], but I was swamped and time was of the essence.

I did a standard 10-question introductory review without juicy, interesting questions that you are referring to. Those need a lot of background information to come up with. I usually end up with a lot of scratched off questions that never get send, because they are obvious. As Leo has said: ‘We need to go deeper’. And that is what I try to do everything. There is more often than not something special in each person to dig for questions.

That is my strategy for keeping things fresh as well. Part of why I closed my feature Reviewer Time [where I interview book reviewers] is because after awhile interviews boil down to the same topics and rephrasing keeps the charm only for so long. I need a new scandal, shit storm or epic news to add diversity in my questions. Repetition is an enemy, but sometimes it’s even good to have it pop up, because asking the same questions to wildly different people will get a different set of answers and give the interviewer a wider understanding of whatever topic he’s asking about.

TB: Are there any scandals, headlines, or storms that you see on the horizon? Are there any subjects that really pique your interest right now? Do you have a dream list of interviewees (alive or dead) that you would chomp at the bit to interview if it were possible?

HM: At the moment, I’m out of shape and far from tuned to the massive monster that is the blog-o-sphere. I’m interested in the upcoming zombie TV series ‘The Walking Dead’, which isn’t as book related [although I currently learned that it was optioned for a trilogy as well] as it could be. Storms happen all year long to be honest. We’re an ever-growing lot and we’re opinioned, so we step on our toes every so often and that results in what reviewers call ‘shit storms’. So far there is a sign that one may crop up soon enough… I’m not sure why I’m never involved in those [they look like fun]. I guess I’m an on-looker.

To answer the second part, I’m currently interested in how anthologies are assembled. It’s not entirely new as a topic for me, but it has held my interest so far the longest. As far as my own special list goes, I’d definitely go with the obvious: Poe, Lovecraft, Tolkien [Jane Austin as embarrassing as it is] and Angela Carter. From the living I’d pick Stephen King and the weird Haruki Murakami. I’m not good at listing to be honest. I’m sure I have way more.

TB: So you've asked a bunch of questions. How do you create on a logical conclusion to an interview? Do you factor in time constraints or interview length? Do you just cut it off, or do you ask the interviewee for a final word?

HM: In the beginning I did not use anything to mark the end of an interview. It ended and that was that. No clue or anything. After reading enough interviews I spotted how interviewers prepped their guests for the end, giving them the opportunity to say whatever they had on their mind as a final word. I rarely bother with time constraints or length. I like to talk and listen to others. I wouldn’t interview them otherwise and the e-mail allows me to go at length without bothering with time or length.

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Reviewer Time: Fabio Fernandes ["Post-Weird Thoughts"]


So far on the “Reviewer Time” I have had to comment upon websites I have frequently or at least semi-frequently visited for a very long time, enough to have constructed an opinion. But the case with “Post-Weird Thoughts” is a little different. I admit I am not gifted with effective time management skills or concentration to cover a wider number of websites and many decent blogs get overlooked. What I am saying with this lengthy prelude is that I will show to new readers “Post-Weird Thoughts” as they themselves would experience for the first time.

The first thing you are going to notice is that Fabio Fernandes is all the things book reviewers are interested in. He is a writer with several published short stories, a translator, a scriptwriter and a game writer as well as Cyberculture and Science Fiction researcher. With a biography like this you know in an instant that he can bring a fresh angle to every topic discussed in our circles. Up until now “Post-Weird Thoughts” has endured a slow period of irregular posts, but after a sudden galvanization the site is experience an interesting flow of activity aimed more or less towards the community and events rather than a singular work. His posts offer more coverage on events such as the Hugo Awards, commentary on the nominees and announcing of the winners. Then there are topics such as conventions, interesting interviews, major linkage and monologues on current events that transpire through the World Wide Web.

It’s safe to say that he is not an active reviewer and his particular strength is the discussion of his cultural surroundings rather than dissecting novels most reviewers do, but when Fabio reviews he does it in his own way. Through his reviews one can catch a glimpse of the writer as his sentences flow with their own distinctive spark that draw a person in and create an interest in a title, where for instance you would normally not exhibit. I find such is the case with the overview of the Hugo award nominated short stories, where the style an easy for the mind blend of conversational tone and intellectual prose lures the reader in. I for one sense that it’s worth the shot to hang around Fabio, because for one he is a multi-sided person with a great deal of understanding the literary world as well as being quite friendly to new commenter. Perhaps another tidbit worth mentioning as well is that among other endeavors Fabio is also a contributor to Fantasy Book Critic, which gives him extra credit.

As a conclusion, it’s a good place to visit if one wants a breath of something else the world of speculative fiction has to offer, since literature is just the beginning.
___

1. We usually know so little almost to none about the people behind the reviews, so I think it’s appropriate to kick off this interview with some personal questions. Who is Fabio in the life outside “Post-Weird Thoughts” and what does a regular day look like for him?

Fabio Fernandes:
Well, I usually wake up early, have a cup of coffee (I seldom eat breakfast – my main meal is lunch) and quickly sit in front of my computer to begin a day´s work – which goes like this: translation (when not translating novels, I´m translating VERTIGO comics for Brazilian Portuguese – I´m doing right now Y:The Last Man and Hellblazer), writing fiction (currently I´m writing a short story commissioned for an anthology and starting a novel, so that´s going to be a tough one, but I´m willing to bet I can do a bit more than 1k a day), writing non-fiction (basically book reviews and/or blog posts), then doing some housekeeping, cooking. After lunch, running some errands (pay bills, for instance) and going to the university to teach. It´s more or less like that any given day, but my teaching schedule changes a little according to the day of the week. Some days I teach classes in the morning, other days in the evening. The rest remains essentially the same.


Hopefully I´m adding swimming to my daily routine from tomorrow on, something I wanted to do for quite a while now (last check-up came out fine, but my doctor told me I need to lose at least 20 kg / approximately 44 lbs).

2. In the fun spirit of list-making, please tell us three things that people would probably never ever guess about you.

FF:
First, I have action figures on my worktable. Of all possible kinds. Currently, in no order of preference: Green Lantern (Hal Jordan, naturally – I´m a fan of the classic stuff), Flash (Barry Allen – ditto), Jack-Jack Parr (The Incredibles), a Baby Buddha and nothing less than two Ganeshs, one of die cast metal, other of orange plush – gifts from my wife, since she knows I´m a huge fan/worshipper of that Indian God of wisdom and science (in the Mahabharata, he is also portrayed as a scribe, so he is kind of a god of writers as well).


Second, I´m a pantheist – I strongly believe in GodS instead of an only unique God. Don´t ask me why: I was a fervent Catholic until my 15 years old, then I became a fervent Buddhist of the Theravada tradition, after that a long hiatus of absolutely nothing, and for the last few years I became more and more conscious of different layers of reality other than our own. I still believe in Jesus and in Siddharta Gautama, but I also happen to believe in Krishna, Vishnu, Shiva, Ganesh. It´s very personal and I don´t talk much about it, but I don´t hide it either.


Third, me and my wife have six imaginary kids. Yes, we do, no kidding. And they talk to us (and to some lucky people when they feel like it, which is unlikely but not extremely rare). But I´m not elaborating about that. ;-)

3. Now to go nearer known territory. What’s the origins story behind your site?

FF:
I´m an old-time blogger. My first blog, the Lanceiro Livre (free-lance in Portuguese, a Journalism blog which I ran from July 2001 to May 2002 and it´s still online here - http://lanceirolivre.blogspot.com/ ) spawned several others, as the Lanceiro Livros (http://lanceirolivros.blogspot.com/) , as far as I know the first serious book review blog in Brazil, though extremely short-lived (sept 2001 / jan. 2002) and Polis (http://polis.blogspot.com/, a technology blog, may 2002 / july 2003). After that, I remained quiet for some time just writing and translating, but disappointed with blogs – maybe because I still hadn´t found what I was looking for. Most of the Brazilian SF community didn´t have any blogs at that time, and if I wanted to make myself heard (or read) I only had the discussion lists on the Web, for I almost hadn´t readers. We always had this strange relationship to technology in Brazil – my generation of SF boasts a big love for high technology, but most of their members took a long time to go online; two of our best fanzines simply folded because their editors refused steadfastly (They still do) to have a site or a blog.


I, however, always was a sucker for the web and networks. I created the first Brazilian SF community in Orkut in 2004, which is still active (though I´m not there anymore – I left it in the hands of Ana Cristina Rodrigues, a very good friend of mine and also an accomplished writer) and had just started to teach classes in two universities, aside from being in the middle of post-grad studies (I had completed my Master´s Degree in 2004 and applied immediately for the Doctor´s Degree, which I got in 2008). Then, as the dust was finally beginning to settle down, I met Tiago Casagrande, a fine young guy that had created with Leandro Gejfinbein a veritable revolutionary blogger cell in the form of a “condo”, the Verbeat project (http://www.verbeat.org/index_org.htm), a free collective which, in five years of existence, has been housing more than 50 blogs of all flavors, most in Portuguese, but some of them in English (and at least one of them bilingual, Portuguese/French). I browsed the condo for some time and suddenly I knew I had found what I´ve been looking for all those years. I approached Tiago, not sure if he would accept me – a mutual friend had scared me shitless, telling me that he would first kind of “interview” me and even then he could blackball me – she was having a joke at my expenses: turned out that he had read some of my fiction in the web and was my fan, so, sure, he could host my blog there, no problem.


First I created a blog in Portuguese only (the Pós-Estranho - http://www.verbeat.org/blogs/posestranho/) which I quickly peppered with posts in English, as I reviewed some books for the Us market and started working as a reviewer for The Fix (http://www.thefix-online.com/) . Then, a few months later, I asked Tiago if I could have another blog in his condo – and he, extremely generous, not only gave the blogspace to me as he also did all the programming! (as he had already done in the other blog, without charging my a cent – how generous this guy can be? He´s on my personal pantheon as well.) I created the PWT to bridge the gap between Brazilian and Anglo-American SF; at least that was my intention in the beginning. Now it appears to have taken another direction entirely, but that´s good too. It´s still bridging the gap, and that´s all that matters in the end.

4. “Post-Weird Thoughts” is quite catchy. How in the world did you come up with it and as an additional question how did you pick the lit genres you discuss?

FF:
Oh, Post-Weird is a direct translation for Pós-Estranho. I love weird fiction (from Lovecraft and Poe to Jack Vance, China Mieville, M. John Harrison, Jeff Vandermeer) and I figured that, if I should have a distinctive voice in the blogsphere, then I should aim for the stars – or, as it was the case, for the weirdest I could get. So it came quite naturally to me.
As for the lit genres, I´m a sucker for science fiction first and foremost. I´m very fond of horror as well, but I must admit I didn´t like Fantasy very much until recently, when I read Miéville, Kelly Link, Joe Abercrombie and some other names that took my breath away. Then I found out that I had (still have) a lot of reading to do to catch up. But SF still is my bread-and-butter. I can´t live without it.

5. Now let’s rewind to the beginning in a barrage of questions. Did you feel it was easy? Was it easy to supply enough books and how were you received at first?

FF:
It was easier than I thought it would be, for a foreigner, that is. Turns out that the Anglo-American market is very open now, and I´ve been even having some very fruitful conversations with writers and editors like Jeff Vandermeer, Lou Anders, Mark Newton, Jeffrey Thomas, Marty Halpern, Robert Sawyer and a host of others whom I thought would be dismissive of a guy from South America. Well, I stand corrected! And that was such a good thing, because we´ve been striking these global conversations the likes of which I could only dream of when I read Gibson and Sterling exactly twenty years ago. A year ago, Jeff Vandermeer had to stop blogging for some months in order to finish his latest novel, FINCH (which I´ll be reviewing soon, by the way) and invited writers from all over the world to be guest bloggers – and I was on his list. I felt very honored and happy, because I felt then I really belonged to a global SF community. Right now, I´ve been getting more books than I can review – but I´m working on a way to speed things up, so don´t give up on me!

6. What’s your approach to writing reviews, your signature so to say that makes you different from all the others? Can you give a tip or share something insightful about the craft?

FF:
I´ll try not to sound much too positive or Pollyana-like about it, but I when I was a little kid I learned something from my late aunt Herminia that I still follow to this day: if you can´t say anything good about someone or something, then you shouldn´t say anything at all. (I´ve heard that it is a very common saying in the US, though not in Brazil.) If I really don´t like a book, I don´t mention it – I don´t want to speak ill of it or its author, but if I don´t care about it, then its best place to me is oblivion, so why should I spread the word about it? Bad books should simply be forgotten. Anyone who likes them must have the right to read them at their leisure, there should be no censure and bigotry at all. This is my opinion, mind you, to be taken, of course, with a grain of salt.

7. What’s your reading schedule? How do you arrange your day to find time to read and review to keep up relative activity?

FF:
I´m addicted to reading. I can read anywhere, even in a hotel lobby waiting for the elevator to arrive. So I read while I´m cooking (one eye in the food, another in the book), while I eat (I know, it´s not healthy, but old habits die hard), and most of all in bed (I sleep late and most nights I almost don´t sleep at all).

8. In retrospect, have you ever done a negative review and how did you handle the situation? Every once in a while a book comes that doesn’t agree with a reviewer and there was a heated discussion revolving around negative reviews and what comes afterwards. Was there any fear of ruining your relationship with publishers?

FF:
I´ve done my share of negative reviews when I was a professional journalist, actively working for the Brazilian press. Most of the times I could just sweet-talk the editor and choose books that I knew I had all the more chance to like, and I can remember at least of one particular time when I told the editor I wasn´t going to review a certain book because it had been written by a Brazilian fascist right-wing “philosopher” – and fortunately all went well, because the editor respected my opinion, and she could find another reviewer best suited for such a job. In PWT, so far I have only done one negative review, which was the review of David Walton´s Terminal Mind, which incredibly won the Philip K. Dick Award with Adam-Troy Castro´s Emissaries From The Dead, which in my opinion should have won alone hands down. I sent e-mails to both authors to congratulate them and to tell them I had published review of their books. Both answered me very politely, thanking me for the reviews, and that was it. I never got a complaint from Mr. Walton, though I should infer that he probably didn´t like my review (I remained respectful of him and his work, however – I just made clear it was not award-winning material). But, thank God, I had no problems at all, nor I ever want to have to do it again – but if need be, I´ll do it. I think that, if a reviewer remains professional, he/she doesn´t need to fear ruining a relationship with publishers.

9. Now, how do you think you and your blog have grown from your first post up until now? Did the formula ever change and can you describe the path of your evolution?

FF:
I think PWT grew very, very much since day one. The blog changed from a naïve, excited sort-of “Hi-mom-I´m-here-on-TV” (well, not that much, but that´s how I felt then, because I was so very excited to be writing for a wider audience) from a more professional look. I´m not a professional blogger because I´m not being paid for it, but I do take it very seriously. I tend to whine from time to time, to excuse myself to my readers because I couldn´t meet this or that date or some review I promised I would do. Approximately two weeks ago, the blog changed. There´s a brand new header (again a wonderful painting by artist Fabio Cobiaco – a REAL painting; he gave me the original, which I´m proudly going to hang in my scriptorium´s room wall), Tiago revamped the layout completely, gave it a whiff of fresh air. It also gave me a fresh slate of sorts to start with. In the next few weeks, after Anticipation and the Hugo reviews, I´ll be writing more about my creative process, alternating it with book reviews.

10. We know that you have been writing short fiction and successfully published some of your shorts. As a non-native speaker and writer how hard did you find writing and publishing in America? Also do you have any tips for aspiring non-American non-native speakers, who wish to tread on the same path?

FF:
I made a quick, very shy advance on publishing in America more than ten years ago. In 1998, I wrote a short story and got it published in an e-zine which, to my knowledge, is not online anymore. Aside from this small victory, I sent several stories by snail mail to magazines, but I was refused by all of them. But 1998 was a very hard year for me personally; I almost gave up on writing completely, even in Portuguese, so I ended up not sending any more stories in English-- Until the creation of Post-Weird Thoughts made me think this time was the right time, this time I could write in English and aim for the Anglo-American market, because I always felt more attuned to it than to the almost non-existent Brazilian SF market. (Though now this is changing; very slowly, but it´s changing all the same.)


The only tip I can honestly give to you is: write, write, write. Hone your skills. Non-stop. Abandon all excuses and throw yourself into the wondrous fray, the heat of the battle that is clashing with the words of a foreign tongue. Sleep with it, talk to yourself in it, make this otherworldly language your own, as if you had been born to it.

11. Can you also share a bit about your creative plans as well?

FF:
Certainly. I just began working on my first novel in English, which takes place in the universe of “The Boulton-Watt-Frankenstein Company” (http://everydayweirdness.com/e/20090223) and “The Arrival of the Cogsmiths (oil on canvas, by Turner, 1815)” (http://everydayweirdness.com/e/20090427/) . I just sold this last story to StarShipSofa, which already podcasted the first one in the Aural Delights Editions 92 (http://www.starshipsofa.com/20090708/aural-delights-no-92-allen-steele/)
) – the story was delightfully read by Julie Davis, by the way, of the excellent blog Forgotten Classics (http://hcforgottenclassics.blogspot.com/) . But I am finishing at least two more stories in that same universe, so readers should expect more “steampunk Frankenstein” and Cogsmiths adventures in the near future, featuring real-life and famous fiction characters.

12. Which are the authors you favor and have had most exciting times with and on the opposite spectrum, which are the ones you couldn’t connect with and avoid since?

FF:
Robert Silverberg and Frederik Pohl are among the most exciting ones to me still today. More Pohl than Silverberg, but they´re both great masters of prose. Jack Vance also grabbed me by the balls since the first book of his I read in my teens. (He still hasn´t let them go – that old mariner is tougher than Ahab, for crying out loud! I´m still amazed with his Dying World novels.) Today, I´m having great fun with China Miéville, Chris Roberson, Ted Chiang, Alastair Reynolds, Jeff Vandermeer, Joe Abercrombie, Patrick Ness, Hannu Rajaniemi, Liam Sharp, Paolo Bacigalupi, Elizabeth Bear, David Louis Edelman. The ones I can´t connect I wipe out of my mind. I avoid them so completely I couldn´t even tell you who they are, because I tend to forget.

13. What are your personal pet peeves when it comes to the speculative fiction genres?

FF:
Currently my personal pet peeves are very much restricted to Brazilian SFF. Despite the fact that there´s been a boom of new writers in the past couple of years, we´re still to see if they will be more than a promise, and that´s because most of them can´t write well in the SFF genre. All most of them they can do is to emulate old, stale RPG scenarios, and that simply can´t be. I already had my share of fighting with many of those so-called authors in the late nineties, but I gave it up in 2000, when I got out of Science Fiction Reader´s Club, the oldest Brazilian association related to the genre, due to a series of pointless arguments that left nothing but bitterness. Fortunately, since then I´ve been able to let those things behind and bury the hatchet with most of the people I had felt aggrieved.

14. Is there a tendency for these pet peeves to resolve?

FF:
In all honesty, I don´t know. Sometimes I think there is, and I fervently hope so, but there are times when I think that there are people who are just content to let things stay the way they are. So be it. It´s their problem, not mine. I can´t do anything for them, for I´m not their keeper.

15. What do you think of self publishing? This is a very interesting topic as of late with the numbers of authors self-publishing on the rise and the treatment they receive not only from reviewers, but the whole book publishing community including readers.

FF:
This is happening a lot in Brazil. I think that may be interesting for a writer who is really starting, but not if you already have a reasonable body of work published. But I must point out that in Brazil the situation is completely different – here self-publishing is expensive and means no publicity at all. You should do your very best with your book, but, alas, we also don´t have a massive book review blogger community here – not enough to help boost up sales. You must do a lot of PR all by yourself, going to events and let yourself be seen. But it can be tiresome sometimes, because you must have an awful lot of friends – here in Brazil, you must know influent people so they can introduce you to inner circles of journalists, bloggers, clubbers, and so on. Once I interviewed a famous editor that told me the following: “In America any, say, truck driver can write a book, and, if this book is good, he or she will become a celebrity; here in Brazil, first you must become a celebrity; then you will be able to publish a book.” That´s a very Bizarro-world approach to editorial matters, but that´s absolutely true. So, self-publishing here is not a good option.

16. Tell us a bit about your involvement with Fantasy Book Critic. It’s impressive to be a contributor there and I think a lot of people would be interested in hearing about how you got started there.

FF:
I was a reader of FBC for a while when I read a post by Robert Thompson asking for contributors, because he had some personal matters to attend to. So I talked to Jacques (Barcia, my best friend and until two weeks ago, co-editor of PWT) and told him “Hey, that sounds good, let´s offer a hand to him”, and he accepted it. Robert is a great guy, and so are Liviu Suciu (a reviewer from Romania who lives in New York and is currently the main man of FBC) and Cindy Thompson, who are holding the fort superbly.

17. Do you think there are still areas fantasy has slipped that you would like to cover in other mediums? And how far do you think the fantasy/sci-fi culture will enter mainstream? This I ask because art purists denounce fantasy and sci-fi on a regular basis and yet they keep coming back full speed ahead.

FF:
I never considered myself an art purist, on the contrary. So I can only be for Fantasy and SF all mixed in the mainstream. Some of the best novels I´ve read are considered mainstream by mainstream reviewers and SF by SF reviewers – take 1984 or Brave New World, for example. More recently, we could easily say the same thing about Thomas Pynchon´s steampunk-ish Against the Day – No mainstream writer in Brazil will ever admit it, but Pynchon writes SF-related stories. His short story “Under the Rose”, written in the 50s, is pure steampunk.


I like to think like J.G.Ballard: SF has already penetrated mainstream via pop culture, a long time ago, and nobody noticed it (nobody outside the SFF circle, that is – and that´s even a point to discuss, since I think that´s hypocritical: mainstream always knows when it´s being penetrated.)

18. Also there has been much denouncing of urban fantasy in pretty much the same vein mainstreamers give fantasy and sci-fi the cold shoulder. Where do you stand in this matter?

FF:
I´m all for quality in all genres. If a novel is good, is good. The market forces are doing their job – that´s why a Michael Chabon may publish an excellent adventure novel called Gentlemen of the Road, a tribute to Fritz Leiber´s Fafhyd and the Grey Mouser, and still nobody outside the genre will call him a Fantasy writer, for example. But who do they think they´re fooling? Not us.

19. I am not sure what a closing question sounds like at this topic, so you are free to some some closing words on your own regarding reviewing.

FF:
This I would like to thank you for the opportunity, and to tell you that this may well be the best and most comprehensive interview I ever gave. I can only hope someday I will publish a novel in English and get read by so thorough a reviewer.
Related Posts with Thumbnails