1. Guests
I don’t mind slaving to the things I love to do, but with fours guests a week, the quality I was striving towards did not reach the levels I wanted. I was rightfully accused of rotating the same questions over and over again. After awhile even I got bored of this painful pattern, so in order to lessen the burden for me, but increase the overall quality and fun I have reduced the guests I am having to two per month. Yeah, I am giving it a casual bi-weekly feel.
2. Questions
I’ll put more emphasis here. I think that each interview will be built upon follow-up sessions to create a more natural dialogue feeling. The beginning will be the Customary Three, where I ask the basic introductory questions. Then there’ll be more in-depth questions for discussion and in the end we will close with the Whacky Three, where I will ask three inconsequent and absurd questions. It is not an official structure. There won’t be markers of any sort, but this is what there will be as content. I am wishful that you will discover more blogs, discover mine through theirs and meet/understand/profile the person, whole reviews you follow.
3. Introductory
Each blog will be represented with a set of stats to give a general idea as to how long has the blogger been reviewing, how many posts per month on average he/she does, what genres are the focus, interesting highlights and such. Most naturally I will be saying how I know these people, why I bother talking to them and giving my commentary on their blogs [usually a lot of flattery, because I am too chicken to interview a reviewer, whose blog is fuggly].
---
First official guests are:
Gav from NextRead [February 14th]
Peter from Ubiquitous Absence [February 28th]
---
If you want to support this small feature, link to this post or use these images with the link to this post on your blog.




Fuggly? What is fuggly? Wait... I'll look it up.... Oh. Nevermind...
ReplyDeleteOh that is fucking + ugly mixed together. :)
ReplyDeleteCan't wait. I love the new logos. :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, love. :)
ReplyDelete